Much is written about how changing trade policies can affect companies that buy raw materials and components from targeted countries. But how do suppliers of such goods—in this case, chemical producers—deal with tariff-driven disruption?

The chemical industry is a critical player that supplies raw materials for a host of products—many of which can’t be made if a single chemical is missing. In 2017, the industry generated global sales of nearly US$4 trillion, approximately 19 percent of which was globally traded.1 This makes chemical producers vulnerable to tariffs that could render a large percentage of products financially uncompetitive. At the same time, tariffs can open other avenues for chemical exporters to counteract potential revenue losses.

Changing trade policies generate a complex network of first-, second- and third-order effects that are difficult to identify and navigate. Complicating matters, the chemical industry is asset intensive—a new plant typically takes up to five years to build and start up. It’s not easy to quickly switch production from one country to another.

Changing trade policies generate a complex network of first-, second- and third-order effects that are difficult to identify and navigate.

The figure below illustrates the short-term impact and ripple effects of a tariff on acrylic acid, a key material. If the United States taxes acrylic acid imported from China, it creates opportunities for local producers as well as exporters in other countries to fill the void. Meanwhile, Chinese producers will seek alternative markets for their acrylic acid—say, Europe or Japan. That, at first, creates an oversupply in those markets and tougher competition for producers currently serving them. At the same time, by increasing their U.S. exports, producers in Europe or Japan may create shortages in their home markets. The market essentially realigns supply sources and destinations.

The impact of changing trade policies on trade flows

Charts illustrating the impact of changing policies on trade flows by geographic location.

View the enlarged charts

In addition to a potential rebalancing of trade flows in the short term, mid- and long-term effects can emerge. For instance, does a producer of tariffed goods respond by improving its cost competitiveness? Doing so could lay the foundation for further growth across all the markets the company serves.

Chemical companies certainly understand the risks and opportunities that tariffs can create. Yet in our experience, they typically decide how to respond to tariffs based on gut feel or anecdotal evidence. This can result in identifying suboptimal steps or even doing something that can harm the business.

There’s a better way. Given the complexity of a tariff’s impact and the need to respond quickly, chemical companies need a systematic and fact-based approach to determine the right course of action—uncovering and exploiting the greatest opportunities a tariff creates while minimizing the risks and downside. Two key technologies are important to consider in this situation.

The first is analytics. Eighty-eight percent of executives in the chemical industry report that their organization is increasingly using data to drive critical decision making at unprecedented scale.2 Analytics can be leveraged to apply algorithms to comprehensive data on products, customers, prices, landed cost, share of wallet and other key aspects of a company’s trade flow. This will allow a company to identify the full impact of the tariff and quantify opportunities and risks at the product and customer level. Such analytics can help a company to, for instance, identify specific customers in markets affected by import taxes that may be looking for a new supplier, or alternatively, customers in non-affected markets that affected competitors are looking to penetrate.

The second key technology is artificial intelligence (AI). In a recent Accenture Strategy survey, respondents said autonomous self-learning and the ability to connect data to drive new insights are AI’s top two benefits.3 With AI, a company can learn from previous disruptions of any kind―including force majeures and exchange rate shifts―to understand price elasticities and product- and market-specific triggers for trade flows. This will allow a chemical company to predict or even simulate the impact of tariffs before they are enacted.

Effectively using these tools requires a qualified cross-functional team that includes data scientists as well as representatives from the marketing, sales, procurement and supply chain organizations. Housing such a team in a "control center" that contains the necessary skills, capabilities, and organization structure can maximize the team’s impact and the insights it generates.

Such capabilities enable a chemical company to closely track buying patterns and pricing across markets and customers to make adjustments as needed. In turn, highly agile operations are critical to translating key insights into actions.

No company doing business across borders likes tariffs, which can make it difficult, if not impossible, to profitably serve a market that a company took years to cultivate. But tariffs don’t have to be an obstacle or injurious to the business. By building a cross-functional control center powered by analytics and AI, coupled with agile operations, chemical companies can equip themselves to neutralize the threats and maximize the opportunities that tariffs create. Fostering competitive agility in this way is invaluable at a time when changing trade measures are becoming more pervasive.

1 Cefic Facts & Figures of the Chemicals Industry 2018.

2 Accenture, Technology Vision 2018.

3 Accenture Strategy, Tech-Led Change in AI, 2017.

Bernd Elser

Managing Director – Accenture Strategy


Subscription Center
Stay in the Know with Our Newsletter Stay in the Know with Our Newsletter