Why oil and gas companies could lose and gain the most
October 30, 2019
October 30, 2019
Waste and resources are hot topics. Whether it’s the fierce rhetoric of 16-year old student climate campaigner Greta Thunberg or environmental protesters bringing cities to a standstill across the world, there’s no doubt the circular economy is hitting the headlines.
The energy industry, and more particularly, the hydrocarbon industry is under scrutiny. By 2040, it’s possible that up to 43 percent of anticipated global conventional polymer production could disappear due to circular economy initiatives. What’s more, new waste from advanced materials is only just getting started.
Plastics in wind turbines, solar panels, lightweight composite materials in cars and airplanes are growing—somehow, the European Union must soon manage up to 300 kmtpy of used wind turbine blades.
I believe three elements are hard for the industry to ignore—rising waste consciousness, an industrial recalibration and energy transition. But just as oil and gas companies reconcile with the fact that they could lose up to half of demand growth, there’s a window of opportunity.
Let’s take a closer look at those influential issues and how they set the scene for oil and gas companies to innovate and thrive.
And waste trade has become an international issue, with China’s 2018 waste import ban and more plastics diverted to domestic landfills as a result. Durable plastics waste is another storm on the horizon. As cars raise their levels of plastics, consumers and government will demand materials recovery, rather than landfill.
Our analysis looked at new investment announcements in the United States going back to 2012 (Figure 1). We see a rapid rise in the number of firms talking about industrial recalibration. Industrial recalibration affects trade deglobalization, investment globalization (where investments serve local markets), supply chain costs and energy usage reduction—and offers a chance to close the waste loop.
Our research calculates that there could be an equivalent lost conventional capacity of ~795 world scale polymer plants, by processing all recycling mechanically. Chemical recycling, which converts waste plastics into feedstocks, would likely take a larger share and still utilize and feed conventional polymer technology. Both routes imply that new hydrocarbons demand would be significantly reduced.
What does this mean for oil and gas?
As we can see, these three elements could drive big changes. Global petrochemical demand growth could reduce from just below 4 percent per year to just below 2 percent per year. It is inevitable this will also impact the bottom lines of oil and gas companies. According to our calculations, changes could shave projected oil and gas demand growth by 0.5 percent per year to 2040.
Yet, petrochemicals still represent the highest growth prospect for oil and gas—if the industry can shift and scale.
In my next blog I’ll take a closer look at tapping into the opportunities and how technologies can help to meet the waste challenge. If any of this content resonates with you and your company, do get in touch.
changes could shave projected oil and gas demand growth by 0.5 percent per year to 2040.
 Basic Materials Roundup: Market Talk, The latest Market Talks covering Basic Materials, WSJ, May 31, 2019.
 Accenture Chemicals Global Consumer Sustainability Survey, 2019.
 Generative design, especially when used with artificial intelligence (AI) allows the creation of optimal material use for a function. Think of using honeycomb structures, but more specifically configured to an objects purpose
Accenture talks about the looming crisis of hidden workers due to a growing disconnect between workers and works in the post-pandemic economic world. Read more.
When applications are interoperable processes and functions that drive true business transformation are possible. Accenture talks more about it.
Net zero commitments are proliferating but decarbonisation hasn’t been happening fast enough to hit a 2050 target. Accenture talks more about it.