Skip to Main Content
Access your saved content
To successfully create an electronic ticketing business case that articulates the benefits and realistically gauges costs, organizations need to steer clear of common pitfalls.
Research by Accenture shows that although benefits like customer convenience are clear, the overall business case and financial consequences supporting the implementation of eTicketing is anything but.
eTicketing creates a significant change in transportation businesses and operational models. The resulting transformation goes beyond “just a technical system” and affects everything from front-end service to back-end support. Accenture’s experience shows that the successful implementation and operation of eTicketing requires the different players—often from both public and private sectors—to gain a shared perspective on benefits and challenges, communicate effectively and behave differently.
A solid business case lays the foundation for this joint endeavor. Without it, public transport operators cannot convince key stakeholders (often elected officials) to provide funding for eTicketing projects. And if the business case is done imprecisely—with only a partial view of what it takes to successfully plan, deliver and sustain systems—the consequences can be substantial.
While creating a solid eTicketing business case may be complex to formulate, it is certainly not impossible.
Before even beginning the endeavor, it is critical to establish a lead—the “champion”—on either the contractor or buyer side. Champions should be those organizations that “own” the most customers or have the greatest stake in the overall investment. It is the champion that will infuse the right level of energy and commitment to ensure the delivery of a solid business case, since the champion will have the most to gain—or to lose. If there is no clear lead, eTicketing organizations need to agree upon one central entity to drive business case development.
To successfully create an eTicketing business case that articulates the benefits and realistically gauges the costs, organizations will need to steer clear of some common pitfalls. Accenture research reveals one major stumbling block is too narrow a focus on one factor at the expense of other issues.
Most often the focal point is on infrastructure such as gating systems, ticket vending machines and hand-held inspection devices. But if a business case focuses strictly on infrastructure issues, then the rest of the eTicketing picture is overlooked or underestimated. In some ways, getting the physical infrastructure is the easy part. Getting a grip on the eTicketing business context is more complex as you need to consider processes, behaviors and technology issues that surround the infrastructure.
Another common mistake when planning for eTicketing involves “siloed” business cases that reflect too heavily the interests of only one organization. To build a solid case, a composite overview of the costs and benefits across all major players in the value chain is essential. And while the overall business case might be positive, for some players the opposite may well be true. At this point, it is essential that the champion steps in to push the overall business case forward and acts as an intermediary among the participants.
There is no “one-size-fits-all” business case for eTicketing. The exact solution can only be determined based on specific considerations of demographics, existing physical infrastructure and end-user need. Based on our in-depth experience from strategic planning to the successful implementation of eTicketing solutions, Accenture has built a framework to navigate through this initial and crucial phase.
The answers to these and other critical questions will be fundamental since they will reveal the choices you take and the business case you will develop.
Another key requirement for developing eTicketing business cases: create a multi-disciplinary team to draft the plan. The ideal approach for creating an eTicketing case involves a multi-disciplinary team that includes the key functions touched by the new system: from engineering to IT and back-office support. Additionally, eTicketing will have a major impact on the customer—so the customer contact team as well as sales and marketing should be very actively involved early on.
Making the case for eTicketing can be a daunting process. A low estimate of cost can sink a project in mid-launch while an over-estimation can kill an eTicketing effort before the ink on the business plan dries.
While each business case has its specific aspects and numbers, there are success factors universal to most eTicketing efforts. Business plans need to take a broad perspective on costs and benefits for the multiple entities involved and they need to focus on the entire spectrum of issues from customer experience to revenue generation, infrastructure investments and back-end processes, to safety and security.
The effort demands an unprecedented level of collaboration across disparate parties, and requires a champion—one organization that will drive the process. Getting it right will not only reveal the value of the initial investment, but will also serve as a road map for implementation.
August 7, 2006
Outlook from Accenture
Outlook is a journal of high-performance business.
View Latest Issue
Accenture Health Accenture delivers a wide range of healthcare solutions—from addressing back office functions and electronic medical records to clinical transformation and consumer engagement. Our solutions are backed by real-world experience, business and clinical insights and innovative technologies. Learn More
Insight Driven Health for U.S. Federal Healthcare Organizations From innovating patient care at the Veteran’s Administration to developing incentives for higher quality care at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, U.S. federal health agencies are revolutionizing healthcare in the United States. Learn More
Insight Driven Health for U.S. State Healthcare Organizations The convergence of cost pressures, healthcare reform and technology changes are redefining the landscape for U.S. state healthcare organizations. Learn More
Browse all in Health