Most organizations focus on differences across the regulatory landscape. Accenture believes, however, that one of the keys to an organized, effective response to regulation is commonality—finding regulatory elements common to various requirements across geographies—and addressing them through an integrated approach to avoid reworking and confusion.
Many banks are putting large-scale change programs in place to deal with regulatory initiatives. The key to success is to determine in which parts of the business the bank wants to remain and to steer toward that future.
-
It is highly unlikely banks will be able to keep the same business model and simply plan on absorbing the impact of the new regulations.
-
Banks should also institutionalize capital performance measures within their business strategy if they are to support the overall success of such response programs.
-
The cost of compliance is high but those organizations that institute a centralized, strategic regulatory response program have more control over managing and optimizing their investment in compliance.
Financial institutions have a range of options regarding the implementation of responses to these new regulations. These range from basic compliance to a comprehensive, optimized outcome that uses the regulatory response as a lever to make needed changes to the business model.
Banks must establish priorities and determine what resources and funding will be needed to reach these objectives through the appropriate path. The framework for regulatory response needs to be closely tied to the bank’s overall strategy. The best approach to complex regulatory demands is to organize them into common themes for implementation.